Actual hours vs AI estimates
Compare logged developer time with AI-generated estimates for both AI-assisted and manual development.
InsightPM analyzes every pull request and compares actual logged hours against AI estimates with and without AI assistance — so founders and clients can verify engineering effort without reading code.
PR #482 — Support multiple email recipients in report exports
insightpm/reports · opened by @hudv · +312 −94This pull request looks smaller than the time logged. Similar work should likely take less time with active AI-assisted development.
InsightPM turns code changes into plain-English business reports. For every pull request, it shows what was delivered, how complex the work was, how much time was logged, and whether that time looks reasonable compared to AI-generated estimates.
Compare actual developer time against AI-generated estimates based on the real scope of the pull request.
Understand whether the work looks AI-assisted, manually implemented, or slower than expected for the size of the change.
Get a plain-English summary of the scope, business impact, risks, and effort behind every pull request.
Know whether your team is moving efficiently and whether the hours logged make sense for the work delivered.
Verify time & material development work with independent AI-based effort estimates.
Understand what shipped, how much effort it required, and where delivery may be slower than expected.
Use InsightPM internally to review developer productivity, estimate quality, and AI adoption across the team.
Every feature in InsightPM exists to answer one question: does the logged time look reasonable for the work actually delivered?
Compare logged developer time with AI-generated estimates for both AI-assisted and manual development.
See whether the pull request shows signs of effective AI-assisted development or mostly manual work.
Understand what changed, why it matters, and what was delivered without reading code.
Spot work that looks overestimated, underestimated, or inconsistent with the actual scope.
Use risk and complexity signals only as supporting context for effort evaluation.
Connect development activity and logged time to pull requests for a clearer view of delivery.
From your repository to a plain-English verdict on whether the logged hours look reasonable.
InsightPM reads pull requests from your repositories.
Use logged Jira time or enter actual time manually for each pull request.
The platform reviews the scope, complexity, changed files, and business impact.
InsightPM shows whether the logged time is aligned with AI-assisted and manual development estimates.
See if the work looks reasonable, slower than expected, or potentially inflated.
Use evidence from real pull requests to start better conversations about time, scope, and productivity.
Get an independent AI-based estimate of expected effort and compare it to the actual logged time.
See the gap between AI-assisted and manual estimates to understand the productivity opportunity.
Verify time & material work with an independent second opinion on effort and scope.
Look at AI usage signals across pull requests to understand real AI adoption in the team.
Surface the changes where logged time is well above AI-based estimates, so you know where to look.
Read a plain-English summary of scope, business impact, and effort behind every pull request.
Use credits to analyze pull requests and compare actual hours against AI-based effort estimates. No subscription.
For solo founders trying InsightPM on a single project.
Analyze pull requests and compare actual hours against AI-based estimates.
Buy creditsFor agency clients reviewing time & material development work.
Verify effort across multiple pull requests with independent AI estimates.
Buy creditsFor active product owners and small agencies.
Track effort reasonableness and AI usage signals across a busy backlog.
Buy creditsFor organizations verifying multiple teams and repositories.
Run effort comparison at scale across repositories and contributors.
Buy creditsCredits are used to analyze pull requests and compare actual hours against AI-based effort estimates. Credit usage may vary depending on pull request size, complexity, and product feature.
Need a custom or Enterprise package? Contact support.
InsightPM analyzes every pull request and generates two AI-based effort estimates: one assuming active AI-assisted development, and one assuming fully manual implementation. It compares those estimates against the actual logged hours from Jira (or hours entered manually) so you can see whether the time looks reasonable for the scope of work delivered.
No. InsightPM does not track keystrokes, screens, or developer behaviour. It gives founders and clients an independent second opinion on effort, scope, and delivery pace based on the actual content of pull requests — so conversations about time and productivity can be based on evidence, not guesses.
No. Every pull request gets a plain-English summary covering what was delivered, how complex the work was, how much time was logged, and whether that time looks reasonable. You do not need to read code.
No. InsightPM provides signals and independent estimates, not guaranteed detection. Results are framed as "looks reasonable", "higher than expected", or "AI usage signal: low/high" — supporting context to help start better conversations, not accusations.
You install the official InsightPM GitHub App and pick which repositories it can read. You can connect Jira to use logged time, or enter actual hours manually per pull request. All GitHub permissions are read-only and can be revoked at any time.
We only read the metadata and diffs of pull requests you explicitly authorize. We do not clone or store your full source tree, and we do not train models on your code.
InsightPM sells prepaid usage credits. Standard packs are $10 / 100 credits, $20 / 200 credits, $50 / 500 credits, and $100 / 1000 credits. Pay as you go — no subscription. New accounts get free credits to try the product.
Questions about effort verification, custom packages, or anything else — send a message and we'll get back to you.